Jéské Couriano ( v^_^v) 20:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Reply Thanks for the clarification. Besides, administrators are going to be camping here all the day it's featured. Wikipedia is not censored for minors, mores, or twats. This is a serious issue, I believe: Wikipedia should not promote such a website.
It seems that /b/ is planning both to "invade" Wikipedia and spam 4chan boards with gore (extremely shocking) pictures. I think you may want to take it up to AN/I while there's still time, Raul. Raul654 ( talk) 07:56, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Reply It is a good idea indeed, I watched closely this /b/ thread and even if there won't be any coordinated attack (/b/ is chaos as a concept), we will see this article edited unproperly or flooded with. In fact, it might be worth increasing it from semi to full protection. Just a note - given this, this article should absolutely not be unprotected while it's on the main page. 37 Inclusion in TIME 2009 World's Most Influentual People list.35 TIME Magazine nominated moot the most influential person of the planet.33 Basementdad: is ReadWriteWeb a reliable source?.25 Can someone with the proper privileges do me a favor.10 Copy of article is cascade protected.
0 kommentar(er)
